Re:Most US jobs created since 2005 are not conventional full...
by baursak on Thursday October 26, 2017 @10:46AM
(#15559243)
Sure, Marx was smart and all, but practically, what it comes down to, is a few options.
- Capitalist markets
- USSR style central planning
- Anarchist-leaning gift economy, not scaleable beyond n=1000 or so
- Market socialism strains like mutualism or ParEcon, both of which have major issues of their own
- Any mix of the above, e.g. "Socialism with Chinese characteristics", which has been the best economic performer of the last 30 years or so.
In other words, at some point you need to come down from pie in the sky Marx quotes and make physical implementations, which is always more difficult than theory.
So if central planning is problematic, what do you choose then?
- Capitalist markets
- USSR style central planning
- Anarchist-leaning gift economy, not scaleable beyond n=1000 or so
- Market socialism strains like mutualism or ParEcon, both of which have major issues of their own
- Any mix of the above, e.g. "Socialism with Chinese characteristics", which has been the best economic performer of the last 30 years or so.
In other words, at some point you need to come down from pie in the sky Marx quotes and make physical implementations, which is always more difficult than theory.
So if central planning is problematic, what do you choose then?