Re:Berkeley Uses Optical Scanning to Recover Indigenous Voic...
by pbhjpbhj on Thursday October 26, 2017 @11:14AM
(#15559565)
Sorry my culture is that those, outside my culture, with smug arguments aren't allowed to respond negatively.
Retract your comment or prove you're wrong by maintaining it.
---
Also, are you saying anthropologists would never intefere or contradict a distinct cultures wishes? I know that's not true.
We should let the rich decide who pays taxes too, as they have most experience of it, no.
Re:Berkeley Uses Optical Scanning to Recover Indigenous Voic...
by eesmith on Thursday October 26, 2017 @01:01PM
(#15560785)
Since it wasn't clear, my comment was to point out that anthropologists are likely to have a better idea of what it means to "treat people as people" than you do.
Re:Berkeley Uses Optical Scanning to Recover Indigenous Voic...
by microcolonel on Thursday October 26, 2017 @10:54AM
(#15559346)
> Perhaps we could call it "anthropology", from "anthropo-" for "man, people, humanity" and "-logy" for "the study of".
They might get a bit smug if we teach them a couple of Greek words.
They might start to think that their faeces are aosmic (ά- without, -οσμο odor).
Perhaps we could call it "anthropology", from "anthropo-" for "man, people, humanity" and "-logy" for "the study of".
Then we could let anthropology researchers figure out the best way to handle these sorts of issues.