News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Berkeley Uses Optical Scanning to Recover Indigenous Voic... by protomyth on Thursday October 26, 2017 @06:06AM (#15557607)
> that the people being recorded must have known and consented to the recording (it would be painfully obvious, given the way the technology worked at that point)

Being sat in front of a recording device and told to speak doesn’t imply the speaker actually wanted to record his or her voice. Many folks were forced to take pictures also.

Re:Berkeley Uses Optical Scanning to Recover Indigenous Voic... by microcolonel on Thursday October 26, 2017 @07:32AM (#15557962)
That's interesting, is there some account of the circumstances of these recordings? Were they held captive or something?
Re:Berkeley Uses Optical Scanning to Recover Indigenous Voic... by protomyth on Thursday October 26, 2017 @09:07AM (#15558427)
I didn't see an account, but it wasn't exactly a rare event to force the issue. The other possible cause for caution is the recent backlash against Universities' interaction with the tribes. The biggest culprit is using data about the tribes to write grants to provide services on the reservations without input from the tribes (or finding out if they are stomping on the tribes or tribal entities own requests). It has instilled a sense of caution in a lot of organizations.