Re:The Uncanny Resurrection of Dungeons and Dragons
by artimaeis on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @09:18AM
(#15549805)
In fairness to Java/C# I think D&D 4 might be better represented as Scratch.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scratch_(programming_language)
Re:The Uncanny Resurrection of Dungeons and Dragons
by a-saleh on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @09:51AM
(#15550090)
I actually heard that D&D 4 was even more rule-based/tactics ... so maybe even ADA? :D
Re:The Uncanny Resurrection of Dungeons and Dragons
by KON_Air on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @06:40AM
(#15548958)
C# should cover everything (or GURPS), it can do anything, if you can keep up with its caprices (a billion rulebooks) and afford the hardware (7/24 caffeine injections) to keep it going.
Re:The Uncanny Resurrection of Dungeons and Dragons
by tehwalrus on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @06:57AM
(#15549024)
I would compare GURPS to lisp, given that it tried to encompass any possibility with increasing complexity!
Re:The Uncanny Resurrection of Dungeons and Dragons
by Yuioup on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @08:33AM
(#15549492)
D&D First Edition is Assembly?
Re:The Uncanny Resurrection of Dungeons and Dragons
by artimaeis on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @09:21AM
(#15549830)
I think most of the time AD&D is referred to as First Edition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Editions_of_Dungeons_%26_Drago...
But to extend on your point - maybe Original D&D is like Forth in this analogy?
I love it. But I would choose different languages:
AD&D: C
D&D 3.5: C++
D&D 4: Java/C#
D&D 5: C++11
Fate Core: Python
:)