News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Executing Parallel Statements to Improve Performance. Parent comment

Re:Executing Parallel Statements to Improve Performance by andreimatei1 on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @12:18AM (#15547430)
Why do you say that they don't hold, exactly? We take our consistency guarantees, and correctness more generally, deadly serious. I think it's fair to say that we did quite well on Aphyr's review; he's found some quite obscure issues that were quickly fixed. More details here: https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/cockroachdb-beta-passes-j...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Executing Parallel Statements to Improve Performance by carterehsmith on Thursday October 26, 2017 @12:19AM (#15556311)
"We take our consistency guarantees, and correctness more generally, deadly serious"

That is empty talk, ie advertising.

In a distributed database, as is the state of the art, you sacrifice one of: availability, consistency, performance.

This is true for every db, be it Spanner, or MongoDb.

Best to document what exactly was sacrificed. Just claiming that you "take it seriously" means nothing. BTW good luck :)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Executing Parallel Statements to Improve Performance by manigandham on Saturday November 04, 2017 @08:42PM (#15627596)
Is that your own spin on the CAP theorem? Where does "performance" even come into the equation?

And CRDB is a CP system, just like Spanner.

[ Parent | on HN ]