News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Amazon Aurora with PostgreSQL Compatibility. Parent comment

Re:Amazon Aurora with PostgreSQL Compatibility by markporter_aws on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @09:22PM (#15546626)
What instance types would you like to see? T2s? If so, which ones?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon Aurora with PostgreSQL Compatibility by concrete_d on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @10:07PM (#15546824)
My team was hoping for db.t2.small and db.t2.medium so we could compare against similar sized regular Postgres instances.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon Aurora with PostgreSQL Compatibility by markporter_aws on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @10:41PM (#15547011)
Thanks for the replies - we're working on smaller instances, though we don't have a date yet!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon Aurora with PostgreSQL Compatibility by efisher2892 on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @10:22PM (#15546889)
We are also looking to test the small and medium t2s versus PostgresRDS on small and medium.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon Aurora with PostgreSQL Compatibility by philliphaydon on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @10:59PM (#15547095)
Where I work we currently run 2 RDS PostgreSQL Instances in production, one on T2.small and the other T2.medium.

We never run out of CPU credits. We are dying to move to Aurora but the current instance sizes prevent us :( until we fully move away from SQL Server where our load on PostgreSQL will increase, its a huge cost for 0 gain right now.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Amazon Aurora with PostgreSQL Compatibility by omarforgotpwd on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @01:10AM (#15547648)
i have a postgres running on a t2.small in RDS right now
[ Parent | on HN ]