News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Attack of the week: DUHK by jorangreef on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @09:12AM (#15541243)
"hashing the output of a RNG is a bad countermeasure against a possibly-bad RNG"

Why? I would think it's a fair suggestion for defense in depth, especially if you need to expose the result as a nonce, and you don't want to leak anything else unwittingly. It's also a good idea if you're not sure whether the entropy is evenly distributed, which is where something like HKDF would also want to hash the entropy source.

"using protocols that don't require entropy"

That rules out most secure protocol handshakes.

Re:Attack of the week: DUHK by wbl on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @09:19AM (#15541280)
You could just use a better RNG in the first place.
Re:Attack of the week: DUHK by jorangreef on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @09:46AM (#15541448)
The point is that it's not XOR. You can use a better RNG and also hash entropy before exposing it as a nonce. Why throw out defense in depth?