Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start

Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by freeflight on Monday October 23, 2017 @10:45PM (#15538825)

I don't see what AirPods do that any other, more affordable, Bluetooth headsets don't. I get the wireless appeal, I like using my cheap 20€ Bluetooth headphones with build in microphone/remote. I mostly got them for the remote, their 7 hour running time lasts me for like 3 days of commuting.

But I also still carry around my wired UE triple.fi because I like having the option for going wired, better sound quality, less latency and especially less drain on my iPhone SE's battery due to disabled Bluetooth.

Even when nothing is paired/active just having Bluetooth enabled seems to drain phones batteries so much faster.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by jonknee on Monday October 23, 2017 @11:42PM (#15539035)

The thing AirPods do is work better than other, more affordable, Bluetooth headsets. There’s no lag, you painlessly pair once and can use on all your Apple devices, they’re so light you can easily forget they’re in your ears, etc etc. I have a Plus which has a much bigger battery, but I don’t notice any difference with Bluetooth on or off.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google's latest iPhone rival off to a rocky start by dpkonofa on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @10:39PM (#15546995)

There is no latency or battery drain with the AirPods. That's exactly why I can't compare them to any of the other Bluetooth headphones I've tried. They are significantly better.

[ Parent | on HN ]