Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou...
by WalterSear on Monday October 23, 2017 @03:55PM
(#15536418)
Commuting to collaborate with other people face-to-face for half the day.
How is this inefficient, unsustainable?
It provides the combination of private work and group interactions that are parcel of most white collar jobs. The vehicles will be electric, and many will probably spending any idle time at solar farms, to save on energy distribution costs, if they aren't being used as private offices. It is going to allow people to live where the want, and still do they work they want to.
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou...
by ghaff on Monday October 23, 2017 @04:18PM
(#15536602)
It sounds as if it would make a lot more sense for people to agree on 2 days per week to be in the office and work remotely the other three or something along those lines.
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou...
by GFischer on Monday October 23, 2017 @05:51PM
(#15537227)
That's what they do at the company I work for (I'm at a remote location so I'm 100% remote for them).
I think it's the kind of setup that works best, for some kinds of software projects.
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou...
by WalterSear on Monday October 23, 2017 @04:30PM
(#15536704)
And get up 1.5 hours earlier, two days a week, and get home 1.5 hours later, to sit in their cars?
Moreover: the cadence of business just won't let this happen, or it would be widespread already.
The chance that is coming is that cars drive themselves. As a consequence, part of the business day is going to be spent working during the commute.
Sounds like a terribly inefficient and unsustainable lifestyle. Commuting just for stand up?