News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by irrational on Monday October 23, 2017 @01:46PM (#15535205)
Same in Portland. A house down the street was purchased for 180k 2 years ago and recently sold for 520k. And that isn't some outlier. It seems all anyone wants to talk about is how quickly home prices have inflated.
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by maxxxxx on Monday October 23, 2017 @02:06PM (#15535420)
It's funny that the Fed is still dreaming about having low inflation while the number one expense most people will have experiences rampant inflation.
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by dtech on Monday October 23, 2017 @03:04PM (#15535999)
It's impossible to control skyrocketing house prices in booming tech areas with anything other than a massive amount of new housing developments.

Even if everything you can buy suddenly got 10% cheaper, the houses in those areas would immediately increase back to the old level because the prices is driven by a high demand relative to supply.

Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by maxxxxx on Monday October 23, 2017 @03:57PM (#15536437)
Makes sense. To me it just seems they act as if inflation was low but in reality they are creating huge asset inflation with the low interest policy.
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by guelo on Monday October 23, 2017 @02:49PM (#15535851)
Housing is not experiencing rampant inflation when you look at the nation as a whole. We have one currency so the Fed has to try to strike a balance that works for everyone.
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by teemwerk on Monday October 23, 2017 @03:04PM (#15536000)
That's an interesting thought, does the government have cpi-like numbers for different localities, or just the one number?

Rents are included in cpi, but home prices aren't. Now, of course they are correlated, but that's certainly one of the arguments against using cpi.

edit: answered my own question, the bureau of labor statistics has more numbers than you can shake a stick at.

Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by conanbatt on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @12:05AM (#15547378)
I want to remark that its not inflation, its just regular demand shock to the market. Specially housing takes time to match the supply to demand.

Inflation is generalized increased of nominal costs, not particular to an asset, nor in 'real terms' which is what is happening here.

Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by nightski on Monday October 23, 2017 @03:00PM (#15535956)
Isn't it very localized?
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by maxxxxx on Monday October 23, 2017 @03:59PM (#15536458)
Based on this it's nationwide: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CSUSHPINSA
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by ghaff on Monday October 23, 2017 @04:16PM (#15536591)
That says it’s about back to where it was 10 years ago. Mind you there was a fairly big run up to the peak of the bubble but most people here aren’t complaining about prices having risen again to 2007 levels.
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by joebubna on Monday October 23, 2017 @02:07PM (#15535426)
Can confirm. I both recently sold my home, and used to be a licensed real estate appraiser before switching to Software Dev.

Our house in the not-super-desirable area of NE Portland was worth ~$265k when we looked at the data in late February/March of this year (strong data supporting that number). When we finally put it on the market in the beginning of May, it sold in 1 day, with multiple offers, for a sales price of $312k.

Yes, that's a $47k increase in value in just over 2 months. When spring hit, real estate prices went bonkers in Portland this year. Also, we bought the house for $160k ~five years ago.

Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by rcoder on Monday October 23, 2017 @02:30PM (#15535664)
We bought a small one-bedroom condo in downtown PDX for my brother to live in ~3 years ago b/c it seemed like a better investment than random stocks/ETFs. He lived there for a year, and we rented it part-time for another four months.

Purchase price was $145k. Sale price (after only 16 months) was $190k.

We used to proceeds from that sale to buy a two-bedroom house for my parents move into for their retirement. Paid $250k last October; recent sales in the neighborhood suggest it's worth $310-325k now.

So yeah, agreed re: bonkers Portland housing price inflation.

Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by conanbatt on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @12:45PM (#15551692)
Not inflation, demand shock.

Inflation is generalized increase in prices. Im sure beers and miso-fries have barely changed prices if at all.

Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by dawnerd on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @09:56AM (#15541511)
My house is alrfull day worth almost 100k more only 6 months later. It’s crazy. Beaverton and Hillsboro are really seeing pricing skyrocket.
Re:Bay Area hammered by loss of jobs: Lack of affordable hou... by conanbatt on Wednesday October 25, 2017 @12:03AM (#15547363)
Im sure portland is getting a lot, but 300% market price increase in real estate in 2 years sounds like a lot.