News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail by linkregister on Monday October 23, 2017 @11:46AM (#15534007)
Under the Stored Communications Act, law enforcement may get emails or other information under third party control with only a subpoena.

Retrieving email via the POP3 protocol typically deletes the email upon retrieval, making it impossible for the third party to comply with requests for already-retrieved emails.

Re:Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail by bhandziuk on Monday October 23, 2017 @05:03PM (#15536914)
>POP3 protocol typically deletes the email upon retrieval

What POP3 client are you using that does this? I've not seen it before. It gets marked as read but that's it.

Re:Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail by linkregister on Monday October 23, 2017 @07:00PM (#15537640)
Geez, Eudora? Outlook Express maybe? I haven’t used POP3 in a decade.

It used to delete from the server after downloading locally. This was when most email mailboxes had a capacity of 10MB.

Re:Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail by bhandziuk on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @12:31PM (#15542859)
I'm writing something that uses POP3 right now and thankfully it doesn't delete anything. I'd have to do things a lot differently if that were the case
Re:Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail by xfer on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @12:39AM (#15539253)
So you think google storage systems work like your normal filesystem?
Re:Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail by linkregister on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @01:34AM (#15539461)
You don’t think that files can be deleted from a Google file system? Does gmail even store email like that, in flat files?
Re:Why ProtonMail is more secure than Gmail by xfer on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @08:06AM (#15540938)
They can be but not instantaneously, because of multiple replicated copies in a distributed environment.