News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Debunking the Java Performance Myth by traspler on Sunday October 22, 2017 @11:46AM (#15527290)
One big drawback of Dropwizard (at least for us) was that it was very problematic to deploy it as a war in a tomcat environment. There is wizard-in-a-box but there were a lot of issues with that as well.
Re:Debunking the Java Performance Myth by RhodesianHunter on Sunday October 22, 2017 @01:13PM (#15527793)
Yeah, that's definitely a square peg + round hole problem. Dropwizard is intended to be deployed as a "Fat Jar" and does not need tomcat/tomee.

This is nice because it makes it easier to treat your servers like disposable cattle when (almost) all of your configuration and dependencies live in your easily deployed Jar.

Re:Debunking the Java Performance Myth by cs02rm0 on Sunday October 22, 2017 @12:35PM (#15527579)
If you're deploying a dropwizard app as a war in tomcat you're doing something a bit odd.
Re:Debunking the Java Performance Myth by traspler on Tuesday October 24, 2017 @03:32AM (#15539866)
True but sadly project specs sometimes change in odd ways.
Re:Debunking the Java Performance Myth by unscaled on Sunday October 22, 2017 @12:20PM (#15527488)
Well, if you're doing microservices you're usually nullifying most of the benefits of this kind of architecture if you're just deploying them on war files on a single application container.