News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Debunking the Java Performance Myth by falcolas on Sunday October 22, 2017 @09:40AM (#15526777)
The JVM has indeed matured to the point where it's on par with other VM style languages, and better than interpreted languages. This wasn't always the case: early in Java's lifetime it was a slow, memory intensive hog. That stigma has stuck.

That said, it's still pretty heavyweight (both the language and the runtime).

It also wouldn't be my first choice for compute intensive tasks (for example, a non-toy ray tracer). It would do the job eventually, but at a cost. Of course, I wouldn't pick Go or Python either.

Re:Debunking the Java Performance Myth by agumonkey on Sunday October 22, 2017 @10:29AM (#15526979)
Reminds me people blaming clojure slow boot on the JVM when it was in fact clojure tooling that took time.

Things aren't straightforward, we need to go deep before concluding. Profilers, profilers, profilers.

Re:Debunking the Java Performance Myth by amaranth on Sunday October 22, 2017 @11:38AM (#15527258)
There are people in college or entering the workforce who weren't even alive during the "Java is slow" period. The HotSpot JIT has been around since 1999. I wonder if we'll ever be able to let this go.