News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't there any feedback for job finders? by mgkimsal on Tuesday July 27, 2010 @04:20PM (#1552588)
I've considered this an issue for a long time. What's even more annoying is when you apply and don't even get the courtesy of an acknowledgement. I've thought for a while that some enterprising job application software startup could add a 'be polite' function which would automatically reply back to someone after X days if the employer decided not to follow up.

But as someone else mentioned, we're (in the US) such a 'lawsuit happy' place that many companies are likely fearful of committing anything in writing which would come back to haunt them. Even truthful, as in "based on your application, you're not qualified to work here", might offend someone.

Personally, I think that excuse is a bit overblown, and I suspect it's more a factor of people being lazy or overworked when they don't reply.

What does a company get out of spending time replying to applicants they've turned down? A reputation of being professional, perhaps even 'outstanding'. When getting totally ignored becomes the norm, even getting a polite 'no thanks' acknowledgement might be something to make you think twice about that company and how you refer to them in the future.

Also, many companies could do well to post on a blog the types of candidates they're looking for, explain the process, and perhaps even give genericized examples of things to avoid in an application, based on the previous applicants. This would help get them a better prepared applicant, making the process a bit easier for them.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't there any feedback for job finders? by slantyyz on Tuesday July 27, 2010 @04:47PM (#1552669)
If I reject someone who has made the interview stage, I always make sure to contact those candidates by phone/mail (for people who made it to the in-person interview) and e-mail (for those who made it to a phone interview).

For simple applicants, however, I always make sure the ad says 'only those qualified for interviews will be contacted'. Applicants should know from that sentence that "no news is bad news", shouldn't they?

When you're hiring these days, you get a gigantic stack of resumes for each posting. The bigger the pile, the more arbitrary the reason a resume or application is trashed.

Not to sound cold, but people who are hiring try to spend the most time on finding and interviewing the best candidates instead of appeasing the ones that didn't meet their requirements.