Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus
by DrScump on Saturday October 21, 2017 @07:55PM
(#15524285)
... which come at the expense of taking away existing universal-use lanes, worsening all other traffic congestion.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus
by TrinaryWorksToo on Saturday October 21, 2017 @08:06PM
(#15524334)
Which then gets people on the bus, easing the congestion. This is a well documented effect, where the opposite happens, adding more lanes increases traffic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_demand#Reduced_demand_...
Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus
by DrScump on Saturday October 21, 2017 @08:13PM
(#15524362)
a well documented effect
Not really. Had the "road diet" actually resulted in a shift from cars to transit, the transit agencies would show a corresponding increase in their census and farebox return. They didn't.
Re:How Seattle Got More People to Ride the Bus
by TrinaryWorksToo on Saturday October 21, 2017 @09:05PM
(#15524532)
Okay, you're right about the Wikipedia article not showing an increase in those statistics for mass transit. However, this paper does show a substitution effect for busses: http://clinlawell.dyson.cornell.edu/InTech_public_transit_ch...
However, there is an induced demand effect where because there are less cars, more people will drive. So in effect an extra lane appears, empty of the people riding the bus.