News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Post-Scarcity Economics (2013) by maxxxxx on Friday October 20, 2017 @09:45AM (#15515685)
I wonder how things would work out if we had a system where companies beyond a certain size are strongly discouraged. I think the economy would be much healthier if we had many small businesses instead of behemoths like apple and Google
Re:Post-Scarcity Economics (2013) by pault on Friday October 20, 2017 @09:55AM (#15515757)
I was going to say "what about research projects that only a billion dollar company can absorb", but now that I think about it an industry consortium seems like a better outcome for society than a monopoly dictating the industry's focus and creating artificial scarcity. It's undoubtedly less efficient, but spreading the work around many organizations reduces the "bus factor" and the duplicated effort of competing incompatible standards.
Re:Post-Scarcity Economics (2013) by Helmet on Friday October 20, 2017 @10:28AM (#15516034)
Small business employ the plurality of Americans. Also, you made a disparaging comment towards Republicans earlier, and I just want to point out that Google, MS, Apple, etc. etc. are virtually all staffed by liberals and Democrats. Oh, and those Wallstreet bankers that seem to be perpetually in the left's cross hairs? Democrat, democrat, democrat.
Re:Post-Scarcity Economics (2013) by maxxxxx on Friday October 20, 2017 @10:33AM (#15516071)
Are you disputing that the Republican tax plans are mainly aimed towards lowering taxes for upper incomes and most of the benefits would flow to the top 0.x percent? I don't think facts are disparaging.