MongoDB shares jump more than 30% in $192M IPO

Re:MongoDB shares jump more than 30% in $192M IPO by balfirevic on Thursday October 19, 2017 @02:23PM (#15510314)

Word "relational" in relational databases does not stand for relationships between the tables [0]. That being said, relational model is a great fit for plenty (most?) of the data.

[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relation_(database)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MongoDB shares jump more than 30% in $192M IPO by hungerstrike on Thursday October 19, 2017 @04:30PM (#15511298)

Thanks for the technical correction. That also being said, I think that definition is terrible and that anybody trying to understand what a relational database is would be better off not reading that article.

Yes, I agree that most types of data can be stored in tabular form (or an "n-ary relation" per Wikipedia). I'm just wondering what concrete types of data one would rather store in a document.

I don't think there is a good example. The decision to store some data outside of an RDBMS must have more to do with the processing model or something else.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MongoDB shares jump more than 30% in $192M IPO by growse on Friday October 20, 2017 @05:56AM (#15514619)

> I don't think there is a good example. The decision to store some data outside of an RDBMS must have more to do with the processing model or something else.

What else other than the processing model and business requirements would determine how you model and store your data?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MongoDB shares jump more than 30% in $192M IPO by hungerstrike on Friday October 20, 2017 @12:08PM (#15516897)

That was my point. The person I responded to said that they only store "non-relational data" in NoSQL so I was asking what that was.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MongoDB shares jump more than 30% in $192M IPO by balfirevic on Saturday October 21, 2017 @06:49AM (#15521420)

To clear up the possible confusion, the person you are currently responding to said that, not me.

[ Parent | on HN ]