Re:How the Frightful Five Put Startups in a Lose-Lose Situation
by evolve2017 on Thursday October 19, 2017 @01:03PM
(#15509577)
I think this is a pretty bold claim and would appreciate the sources you found probative.
If the statements you offer constitute sufficient evidence for you, I would say that numerous companies and industries have more contact with our lawmakers than what you have described.
Re:How the Frightful Five Put Startups in a Lose-Lose Situation
by bambataa on Thursday October 19, 2017 @02:46PM
(#15510521)
There's a relevant Guardian article today [0]:
'Google executives set foot in the Obama White House more often than those of any other corporation – its head lobbyist visited 128 times. Google spread its money across Washington with joyous ecumenicism. Google spent about $17m on influence peddlers of both partisan varietals. By one count, Google poured more into its DC apparatus than any other public company.'
[0] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/19/surveilla...
Re:How the Frightful Five Put Startups in a Lose-Lose Situation
by evolve2017 on Thursday October 19, 2017 @05:00PM
(#15511521)
Thanks, this definitely bas been a well-played gambit on their part - I had no idea how extensive their lobbying had grown.
Re:How the Frightful Five Put Startups in a Lose-Lose Situation
by ocdtrekkie on Thursday October 19, 2017 @03:01PM
(#15510643)
As I stated, I was providing you with more detailed statements for you to do your own research. My comment was intended as a starting point, not a bible on the topic.
(Hopefully this is enough specifics for you to find any sources that may be of interest to you.)