News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:71% of Americans between 17 and 24 can’t meet the minimum... by Spearchucker on Thursday October 19, 2017 @03:13AM (#15506025)
As a veteran of the border war I have zero understanding for the sentiment of "gratefulness that somebody else is willing to do a necessary and unpleasant job". I similarly struggle with the whole "lest we forget" thing in the UK.

The reason is that in my opinion it legitimizes war, violence and killing. It promotes patriotism, which is nationalism by another name, and a bus stop short of fascism. Fundamentally it suggests that one nation's people are worth more than anothers'. It's a neat trick, and I have a real problem with that.

Re:71% of Americans between 17 and 24 can’t meet the minimum... by Banthum on Thursday October 19, 2017 @04:24AM (#15506301)
It's doesn't have to mean one nation's people are worth more than another's. But it does mean that a person may care about their nation's people more than another's.

This is the same principle as caring about your child more than a stranger's child. A nation is a kin group just like a family is.

Ingroup preference is perfectly healthy when channeled appropriately.

Re:71% of Americans between 17 and 24 can’t meet the minimum... by ionised on Thursday October 19, 2017 @07:30AM (#15506975)
> A nation is a kin group just like a family is.

Given how divided some of the most jingoistic 'democractic' countries on the planet right now are (US and UK) I don't think that supposed kinship is what these people get from nationalism.

To me, it looks like an excuse to tribally hate another group or nation without admitting to it.