Re:UK spies using social media data for mass surveillance
by arca_vorago on Wednesday October 18, 2017 @10:12AM
(#15499284)
Well said. Honestly I am a bit ashamed I didn't know about the difference sooner. A few years ago though I realized that I should probably better understand this document I swore an oath to protect. That journey has not been easy though because it has forced me to challenge popular opinion in both the public and the legal field.
Re:UK spies using social media data for mass surveillance
by duncan_bayne on Wednesday October 18, 2017 @05:09PM
(#15503134)
Don't be ashamed - you're one of the few people who have put in the effort, and _then_ taken the bold step of challenging popular opinions as a result.
Instead, be proud about keeping American ideals alive :)
I'd go further than that; I'd say that the difference is strongly downplayed in political and educational contexts because so much Government overreach is predicated upon people not knowing, or not caring, about the difference.
Also, even people who /do/ understand, often don't care. Because if they did, they'd have to concede that many Federal programmes in the US are unconstitutional, that is, they involve powers not explicitly delegated to the Federal Government by the Constitution.
And folks want their FCC, FDA and Obamacare, so they let it slide ...