Blaming an innocent for how they were cultivated is silly. Especially when those innocents can be rehabilitated.
We're getting a little off topic, but this company is just setting up another Rick to take the blame when the train goes off the tracks again.
That doesn’t mean the dog shouldn’t be put down. It just means there are also other parties at fault.
All it takes is one person in power to care enough to see to that rehabilitation to transform an aggressive "dick" back into a productive team member.
No, it very much does.
We are not cavemen to assign labels to people based only on external outcomes. Ever courts take emotional state and other circumstances into account.
The court might take your emotional state into account when you murder someone, but if they’ve got you dead-to-rights you’re still going to prison.
Does Rick deserve to get blacklisted? No. Would I have been incredibly upset if they named the individual? Yes.
Did Rick deserve to get fired even though they basically set him up to get fired? Yep, he still does.
Did Rick react inappropriately to a horrible situation? Yep, he did.
Similarly I can understand how an aggressive dog came to be (poor training, etc.). That won’t change my opinion that the dog should be put down when it mauls a kid, you know?