News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why physicists still use Fortran (2015) by openasocket on Sunday October 15, 2017 @02:13PM (#15478302)
TensorFlow is for machine learning, not general purpose computations. And no, you will not get better results from a neural network than state of the art computational fluid dynamics.

As for general purpose GPU programming, some parts physics are GPU friendly put not all of them.

Re:Why physicists still use Fortran (2015) by jabl on Sunday October 15, 2017 @02:17PM (#15478335)
IIRC there was some project doing more or less real-time weather forecasts for small areas (think airports and such) that used deep learning instead of traditional CFD style simulations. They were able to do it with several orders of magnitude less CPU usage than the CFD calculations.
Re:Why physicists still use Fortran (2015) by sidlls on Sunday October 15, 2017 @02:56PM (#15478600)
But was it more accurate? Was it for the same purpose? Getting within a few percent of a CFD model might be good enough for industrial use. For studying systems (from the perspective of scientific investigation) it's not even close.
Re:Why physicists still use Fortran (2015) by noobermin on Sunday October 15, 2017 @03:56PM (#15478964)
Of course it isn't which is why ML isn't used by us in the computational community...yet.