News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why physicists still use Fortran (2015) by dagw on Sunday October 15, 2017 @01:50PM (#15478175)
I don't know. Having "rewrote X kloc of scientific Fortran to modern idiomatic C++" on your CV should get you to the head of the line in many places when looking for a job.
Re:Why physicists still use Fortran (2015) by roel_v on Sunday October 15, 2017 @02:03PM (#15478245)
Only if you go after run of the mill coding jobs after your phd, in which case why bother at all. When applying for a postdoc, you'll very much want to bury that part of your work.
Re:Why physicists still use Fortran (2015) by cocoablazing on Sunday October 15, 2017 @03:32PM (#15478836)
Plenty of high-paying quantitative jobs requires such a degree and experience. The majority of phd’s don’t go on to support their family with a tenure-track academic salary.
Re:Why physicists still use Fortran (2015) by dagw on Sunday October 15, 2017 @03:04PM (#15478664)
Or you could be applying for a HPC research job in one of the countless non-university setting that also does that sort of thing. Then having both a relevant PhD and some relevant hands on experience will be extremely helpful.
Re:Why physicists still use Fortran (2015) by 0xbear on Sunday October 15, 2017 @04:02PM (#15479004)
Why would you rewrite something that works well instead of just linking to it?
Re:Why physicists still use Fortran (2015) by quadruplebond on Sunday October 15, 2017 @06:58PM (#15479820)
Because you need to modify or extend it in some nontrivial way.