News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969) by pmoriarty on Sunday October 15, 2017 @04:17PM (#15479068)
If you enjoyed this you should watch Stanley Kubrick's Boxes:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Kubrick%27s_Boxes

Re:An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969) by minusf on Wednesday October 18, 2017 @03:06AM (#15497433)
this is a very recent superbly made documentary: Kubrick Remembered (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhn-nXwpHuc)
Re:An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969) by rob3 on Sunday October 15, 2017 @11:55PM (#15480727)
Thanks, I've totally missed this!
Re:An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969) by valuearb on Sunday October 15, 2017 @11:32PM (#15480660)
“If you were nineteen and starting out again, would you go to film school?

The best education in film is to make one. I would advise any neophyte director to try to make a film by himself”

I give same advice to aspiring developers.

Re:An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969) by cooper12 on Sunday October 15, 2017 @04:36PM (#15479168)
If anyone else was wondering, the film they're talking about in the beginning of the interview, Napoleon, was never made:

> Napoleon was eventually canceled due to the prohibitive cost of location filming, the Western release of Sergei Bondarchuk's epic film version of Leo Tolstoy's novel War and Peace (1968), and the commercial failure of Bondarchuk's Napoleon-themed film Waterloo (1970). (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Kubrick%27s_unrealized...)

Re:An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969) by loevborg on Sunday October 15, 2017 @05:37PM (#15479436)
By the way, if you get a chance to see Bondarchuk's 6 hour version of War and Peace, don't miss it. It's epic, beautiful and highly experimental. It's worth seeing just for the aerial shots during the war scenes.
Re:An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969) by crdb on Monday October 16, 2017 @06:51AM (#15482302)
Also Waterloo for that matter. No CGI in 1970.

From Wikipedia [1]:

"To recreate the battlefield authentically, the Soviets bulldozed away two hills, laid five miles of roads, transplanted 5,000 trees, sowed fields of rye, barley and wildflowers and reconstructed four historic buildings. To create the mud, more than six miles of underground irrigation piping was specially laid. [...]

The battle sequences of the film include about 15,000 Soviet foot soldiers and 2,000 cavalrymen as extras and 50 circus stunt riders were used to perform the dangerous horse falls. It has been joked that Sergei Bondarchuk was in command of the seventh-largest army in the world. [...] A selected 2,000 additional men were also taught to load and fire muskets."

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterloo_(1970_film)

Re:An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969) by ebcode on Monday October 16, 2017 @02:05AM (#15481189)
Room 237 has some compelling evidence pointing to what might have become of Stanley. Anyway, connecting with great souls through their works is one treasure this baleful world of ours can still offer. Thanks for posting this.
Re:An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969) by caf on Sunday October 15, 2017 @10:20PM (#15480458)
It's disappointing to find out that The Killing didn't turn a profit. It's a great film.
Re:An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969) by sosa2k on Monday October 16, 2017 @02:01AM (#15481177)
2001: A Space Odyssey is the greatest movie ever IMO.
Re:An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969) by tom_wilde on Monday October 16, 2017 @07:10AM (#15482381)
+1 See it in 70mm if you can. :>
Re:An Interview with Stanley Kubrick (1969) by garyrob on Monday October 16, 2017 @08:57AM (#15482841)
I'm hoping there will be some opportunities around the 50th anniversary of its release, April 3, 2018. I've actually been waiting for that for years. :)