News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla fires hundreds from headquarters, factory by stock_toaster on Saturday October 14, 2017 @04:33AM (#15471322)
I worked at a bigco during a RIF (reduction in force), and underperforming /teams/ or even /sections/ had their management told, “your team underperformed — fire X number of lowest performers”. Then the manager was effectively forced to just pick people to let go.

Shitty, but par for the course for many bigco places (outside tech), from what I have heard over the years.

Re:Tesla fires hundreds from headquarters, factory by wpietri on Saturday October 14, 2017 @11:48AM (#15472656)
I was consulting once for a large company when one of those came down. A manager I was working with really cared about his team, and it bothered him that he had to lay off one person for basically no good reason besides corporate politicking. He pushed against it for a while, but when they wouldn't relent, he laid himself off.

That didn't totally make sense, as they still had to find a manager for his team. But since the whole layoff was arbitrary, it didn't have to make sense. His whole team stayed.

I always thought it was a baller move. And looking at LinkedIn, he's had a solid career since, so it clearly didn't hurt him any.

Re:Tesla fires hundreds from headquarters, factory by WillReplyfFood on Saturday October 14, 2017 @10:54AM (#15472416)
So its, pick the least social performers, false friends and in-efficient co worker backstabbers.
Re:Tesla fires hundreds from headquarters, factory by tyingq on Saturday October 14, 2017 @10:53AM (#15472409)
It's often not underperformers. Just "pick x% of your team"