Re:Is there an upside to having no social life?
by enraged_camel on Saturday October 14, 2017 @01:42AM
(#15470958)
>>"failure" and "success" are notions relative to goal achievement, and biology doesn't have goals - it's a mechanistic process.
Of course biology has goals. Every living organism's goal is to propagate its genes to the next generation. For details on this, read The Selfish Gene.
Re:Is there an upside to having no social life?
by majewsky on Saturday October 14, 2017 @04:28AM
(#15471311)
I haven't read The Selfish Gene, but from what I've heard it tells the exact opposite: That every gene's goal is to propagate, for which task it merely employs the living organism.
Re:Is there an upside to having no social life?
by PhasmaFelis on Saturday October 14, 2017 @06:25AM
(#15471580)
Talking about "goals" and "desires" can sometimes be a usefully simplified way to think about biology, but it's not really accurate. A bacterium doesn't "want" to reproduce anymore than a rock "wants" to roll downhill. Only quite complex animals can be truly said to have goals.
"failure" and "success" are notions relative to goal achievement, and biology doesn't have goals - it's a mechanistic process.