News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is there an upside to having no social life? by abiox on Friday October 13, 2017 @09:57PM (#15470267)
i tend to read "life" as the experiential aspect of existing, and pursuing my desires.

"failure" and "success" are notions relative to goal achievement, and biology doesn't have goals - it's a mechanistic process.

Re:Is there an upside to having no social life? by enraged_camel on Saturday October 14, 2017 @01:42AM (#15470958)
>>"failure" and "success" are notions relative to goal achievement, and biology doesn't have goals - it's a mechanistic process.

Of course biology has goals. Every living organism's goal is to propagate its genes to the next generation. For details on this, read The Selfish Gene.

Re:Is there an upside to having no social life? by majewsky on Saturday October 14, 2017 @04:28AM (#15471311)
I haven't read The Selfish Gene, but from what I've heard it tells the exact opposite: That every gene's goal is to propagate, for which task it merely employs the living organism.
Re:Is there an upside to having no social life? by PhasmaFelis on Saturday October 14, 2017 @06:25AM (#15471580)
Talking about "goals" and "desires" can sometimes be a usefully simplified way to think about biology, but it's not really accurate. A bacterium doesn't "want" to reproduce anymore than a rock "wants" to roll downhill. Only quite complex animals can be truly said to have goals.