News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What If We Put Warnings on IoT Devices? by 659087 on Friday October 13, 2017 @12:05PM (#15466806)
It also notifies that central host every time someone visits your home, and provides them with video and audio of that person. That doesn't seem like a "neat idea" at all.

"By visiting my front door, you agree to Doorbird's privacy policy"

Re:What If We Put Warnings on IoT Devices? by tripletmass on Thursday October 19, 2017 @10:29PM (#15513160)
The doorbell for Serial Criminals who Sell Out to Federal Agents and/or Cartels. (...near you!) etc.

Speaking of planned obsolesence, it would be nice to be able to take a working 40yo. fixed camera and tell it it's a barcode reader and scheduled wildlife counter, or otherwise to take a power profile change, if not also distinct (llvm, CoolWave, Bluetooth 4.1 profile) promise or callback schema. Maybe tell the shakeweight that you're putting it in the closet in a manner than shaking is no excuse to dissipate more than 21mW. Certainly get (MSDS-ish # circumstance) links from devices that deal in goober or tree nut oils or PVC with flame retardant adjuvants, etc. maybe or maybe not explicitly asking things to McGuyver themselves into a bootstrap industry they don't belong to.

Re:What If We Put Warnings on IoT Devices? by finnn on Friday October 13, 2017 @12:45PM (#15467259)
Couldn't the same be said about all the other shitty cloud-connected surveillance cameras? Not saying that justifies it, just that this is a bigger problem then just those awful internet of doorbells
Re:What If We Put Warnings on IoT Devices? by TeMPOraL on Friday October 13, 2017 @02:10PM (#15467997)
Of course it can be. It's all shitty engineering - making roundtrip through cloud with data that should only ever touch your personal devices.