News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Western news about China depends on intrepid Chinese ‘new... by vkou on Thursday October 12, 2017 @01:07PM (#15459476)
Sure, when you've got an incredibly paranoid sociopath like Stalin, who sees traitors and enemies of the revolution in every shadow, you're going to have serious problems. Xi does not strike me as one. (But I could, of course, be proven wrong.)
Re:Western news about China depends on intrepid Chinese ‘new... by QAPereo on Thursday October 12, 2017 @03:52PM (#15460801)
How about the guy after Xi? After that? The power, once concentrated tends to remain so, and eventually you roll a Hoxha, Stalin, or Pol Pot.
Re:Western news about China depends on intrepid Chinese ‘new... by vkou on Thursday October 12, 2017 @06:09PM (#15461702)
Given that the Maoist gerontocracy managed to produce a dictatorship by Xi, it doesn't seem that it actually protects people from despotism. Eventually, someone wins the power struggle, and consolidates power under themselves.

Comrade Stalin didn't become Vozjd because the Bolshevik party wanted to instill an all-powerful dictator. Like Xi, he decisively won a power struggle in a government which was originally composed of a number of powerful committees.

The revolution had ~30 fathers - yet, 13 years after Lenin's death, all but one of them - Stalin - were dead, in a GULAG, or in exile (And soon to be dead).

The only way to protect against despotism is to have relatively frequent turnover in government. If US presidents and congresscritters were elected for 20 year terms, the US would have long ago become a dictatorship.