News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Competitive Self-Play by wildmusings on Wednesday October 11, 2017 @10:12PM (#15455174)
I can't edit my post anymore:

Another amazing aspect of our ability to categorize is that we only need ONE example of a category before we can identify other members extremely well. Compare this with a machine learning solution, which needs a massive training set to be half decent.

Re:Competitive Self-Play by kayoone on Thursday October 12, 2017 @12:27AM (#15455666)
Humans need a training set as well, infants or small childs won't be able to categorize based on one example, they lack experience just as a neural network. Adults can because they can connect their intuition to a lot of experience from similar objects, but I don't see why an AI could not do the same.
Re:Competitive Self-Play by posterboy on Thursday October 12, 2017 @07:52AM (#15457294)
children will learn new words from one example
Re:Competitive Self-Play by empath75 on Thursday October 12, 2017 @09:13AM (#15457687)
Toddlers certainly don’t.
Re:Competitive Self-Play by posterboy on Thursday October 12, 2017 @06:33PM (#15461846)
how do you know what they know when they can't talk yet
Re:Competitive Self-Play by empath75 on Friday October 13, 2017 @09:08AM (#15465237)
I think that rather proves my point.
Re:Competitive Self-Play by TeMPOraL on Thursday October 12, 2017 @05:53AM (#15456817)
Humans aren't made from magic. We can't use information that's not there. That categorization-by-one-example only works thanks to all our accumulated experience of categorizing things and expectations of how the world works.

I.e. don't compare a 10+ y.o. human with 0 y.o. AI instance.

Re:Competitive Self-Play by Klockan on Friday October 13, 2017 @04:46AM (#15464045)
Humans aren't magic but we don't start out from zero, we have a billion years of evolution behind us.