News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:150 days of living and coding in a van by wellboy on Tuesday October 10, 2017 @03:15PM (#15444533)
Solar panels make their ecological footprint after 3 years of use and last for 30 years. 80% of the material in solar panels is recycled from old solar panels.

So no matter how you turn it, solar panels are a lot alot more environmentally friendly than convential energy sources.

Re:150 days of living and coding in a van by FooHentai on Tuesday October 10, 2017 @04:48PM (#15445200)
>80% of the material in solar panels is recycled from old solar panels.

That doesn't pass the sniff test. Solar cell production is on a strong upwards curve, if 80% is recycled from other panels then supply would be bounded by old solar stock recovery, which is not the case.

I can't see how 80% of solar panel material, even if we're talking exclusively about the PV cells and not the surrounds, could be from old solar panels, especially not 30 year old solar panels.

Re:150 days of living and coding in a van by wellboy on Wednesday October 11, 2017 @10:55AM (#15450262)
In fact it is 90% http://earth911.com/eco-tech/recycle-solar-panels/ and there are nee processes that reach 96%.
Re:150 days of living and coding in a van by FooHentai on Wednesday October 11, 2017 @04:42PM (#15453286)
That's 90% of the material being recovered from old solar panels, not 90% of new panels being made up of recycled material.

That's still great news, but nothing like:

>80% of the material in solar panels is recycled from old solar panels.

Which implies new panels rolling off the production line consisted of 80% recycled material from old panels. That's not possible. If you have 10 old panels coming in to be recycled, and you recover 90% of the materials from them, and you're producing 100 new panels (since production is increasing), at best you're gonna get 9% recycled material into your new panels.