Re:A collection of non-standard punctuation marks
by 3131s on Monday October 09, 2017 @11:05PM
(#15438995)
The interrobang is real, but that's the only one I think.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A collection of non-standard punctuation marks
by justhackedme on Monday October 09, 2017 @11:09PM
(#15439014)
It's not real. The symbol might be attributed some meaning, but it's not real punctuation and definitely shouldn't be.
Re:A collection of non-standard punctuation marks
by colechristensen on Monday October 09, 2017 @11:23PM
(#15439066)
Define "real"
Re:A collection of non-standard punctuation marks
by xelxebar on Tuesday October 10, 2017 @10:53AM
(#15442266)
Wow. It didn't take long to go from punctuation to philosophy.
Re:A collection of non-standard punctuation marks
by dragonwriter on Monday October 09, 2017 @11:49PM
(#15439182)
It's been in use for about a half century; it's typically described as “nonstandard”, though given the absence of a standards body for English it's not clear what that means.
It's definitely “real” in the sense of being in actual use in the wild with a clear and well-understood meaning.
Re:A collection of non-standard punctuation marks
by 482794793792894 on Monday October 09, 2017 @11:31PM
(#15439102)
‽
Re:A collection of non-standard punctuation marks
by boondaburrah on Tuesday October 10, 2017 @12:13AM
(#15439288)
People use it; it's real.