News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Are humans too aggressive to justify having a Nobel Peace... by timbuckley on Sunday October 08, 2017 @10:39AM (#15428370)
It's exactly because there is so much violence that we need to reward actors who work to reduce it.
Re:Are humans too aggressive to justify having a Nobel Peace... by moonka on Sunday October 08, 2017 @10:43AM (#15428389)
Exactly. Maybe it's aspirational, but there's something grand about recognizing those who strive for a better world.
Re:Are humans too aggressive to justify having a Nobel Peace... by abritinthebay on Sunday October 08, 2017 @11:25AM (#15428546)
Seriously. If anything that is the stated purpose of the creator of it after contributing to so much violence with dynamite.

For Harvard this is intensely stupid.

Re:Are humans too aggressive to justify having a Nobel Peace... by megaman22 on Sunday October 08, 2017 @12:44PM (#15428880)
People always bring up dynamite with Nobel, like dynamite was a significant war-fighting weapon, rather than something that spurred tbe construction of the infrasructure that made modern civilization possible.

It's Bofors, and it's place among the Victorian era heavy arms cartel with Krupp and Armstrong-Vickers that he was ashamed of.

Re:Are humans too aggressive to justify having a Nobel Peace... by abritinthebay on Monday October 09, 2017 @02:42PM (#15436354)
The reason people bring it up is Nobel’s own writing on the subject.

I think he’d know.

Re:Are humans too aggressive to justify having a Nobel Peace... by tossaway1 on Sunday October 08, 2017 @12:21PM (#15428774)
Doesn't look like Greenspun has any affiliation with Harvard. They just host his blog for some reason.
Re:Are humans too aggressive to justify having a Nobel Peace... by mikeash on Sunday October 08, 2017 @12:04PM (#15428697)
One might ask: are humans too stupid to justify having a Nobel Prize in physics?