Re:Google accused of racketeering in lawsuit
by amcooper on Saturday October 07, 2017 @10:44AM
(#15423953)
I received a one-month contract—teaching, not developing—from a subsidiary of a large education company. I had to consult a lawyer and fight with them for a week over the contract's overly broad IP claims. They basically wanted ownership of teaching ideas I—or my partner (!)—came up with in perpetuity! I eventually got them to change it to my satisfaction, and had a great teaching experience with a cool group of students, but it really soured my relationship with the company and now i can't imagine working with them again.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google accused of racketeering in lawsuit
by amcooper on Saturday October 07, 2017 @12:30PM
(#15424414)
"This is the first time anyone's had a problem with this," the subsidiary's h.r. rep told me. This approach impacts people who have had experience with contracts and lawyers, and thus aligns with age discrimination.
Re:Google accused of racketeering in lawsuit
by alexasmyths on Saturday October 07, 2017 @08:00PM
(#15426325)
Any ideas you disclose to your company while your an employee could surely belong to you, that's reasonably standard.
As for 'your partner' - that seems pretty crazy, and I don't understand how that would hold up for a second in court.
As for 'perpetuity' - meaning - ideas you had long after employment? Or - that they'd own the ideas you give them while employed, forever. If the later, well, again I think that's somewhere near standard. If the former, that's beyond crazy and I think not even enforceable.
But the 'partner' bit alone seems beyond creepy because their lawyers are not stupid, they must know it's a pretty wobbly thing not likely to stand up in court, ergo it's kind of a scare tactic.