News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lost Laughs in Leisure Suit Larry by klipt on Friday October 06, 2017 @08:21PM (#15421485)
For the Puppeteers, both the sperm and egg producing sexes are sapient, it's their surrogates (a different species) that are non-sapient. Doesn't seem much different to humans hypothetically developing artificial wombs and losing much of our sexual dimorphism over time. If humans gestate their young in non-sapient artificial wombs in the future, would that make us sexist?
Re:Lost Laughs in Leisure Suit Larry by Tossrock on Friday October 06, 2017 @10:23PM (#15421912)
Well, except they explicitly call the non-sentient ones female (also stupid, and property), and the sentient ones are both referred to as male.
Re:Lost Laughs in Leisure Suit Larry by klipt on Saturday October 07, 2017 @02:18AM (#15422512)
Well that's a semantics issue. Niven might argue that since the egg-producers don't gestate the young they're fulfilling a "male" role of merely producing gametes. But I'd argue that the female role is defined more by producing egg cells than by gestation: female fish produce eggs but don't gestate their young, and we still call them female. Therefore the "male" puppeteers that produce eggs are still truly "female".
Re:Lost Laughs in Leisure Suit Larry by ineptech on Sunday October 08, 2017 @12:03PM (#15428693)
The sentient ones are famously docile, cowardly and manipulative. I don't think calling them female would've been striking a great blow for progressive literature.