News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Diminishing returns of static typing by lomnakkus on Friday October 06, 2017 @04:03PM (#15419943)
Ok, fair enough, but what about e.g. "-defer-type-errors" for GHC?

I still think you're just arguing semantics.

EDIT: Incidentally, the statically typed crowd can even go the "other way", namely from runtime -> compile time. For example, it's quite possible to derive a static proof/type from a runtime value in e.g. Idris by pattern matching as long as you're meticulous about building up the proof.

There are no comments on this comment yet.