Re:A Pre-History of Slashdot
by ktta on Thursday October 05, 2017 @01:59PM
(#15411132)
For some reason I think this going to happen to HN too, and I feel it is at 3. And I'm not sure if I'm in group #1 or group #2.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Pre-History of Slashdot
by nathanm412 on Thursday October 05, 2017 @02:28PM
(#15411433)
I think it's been at step 3 for longer than most sites have last. I know I'm part of group 2, but I've seen a somewhat consistent culture since I arrived over five years ago.
Looks like you joined about 5 1/2 years ago. I'm surprised you think you're part of Group #2.
Before what date do you think people can be group #1? Or are you ascribing the group number to contributions rather than date of joining?
When a friend first recommended hackernews to me it didn't show up in google searches. So I gave up. I think techcrunch finally led me to finding it. By the time I actually created an account(just 10 days before nathan^), people were already complaining about the deterioration of the community, so I assumed I was in group 2.
I am most definitely Group #2. I wish I was Group #1, but I was too loyal to /. (and a few other sites), and after /. got DICEd along with the 'f*ck beta' stuff I jumped ship to Soylentnews.org which had an okay community but a rather fascist set of admins (despite what their manifesto says).
So after a few months of lurking, I registered here, and now it's my daily[1] go-to site.
---
[1] Hourly. :)
Re:A Pre-History of Slashdot
by nathanm412 on Friday October 06, 2017 @08:14AM
(#15416160)
That's exactly how I felt.
Re:A Pre-History of Slashdot
by brandnewlow on Thursday October 05, 2017 @02:37PM
(#15411508)
I, along with a lot of people, joined HN in 2008 after Techcrunch wrote about it. That's pretty close to "Group 2 joins" and yet 9 years later HN persists!
I get the feeling a lot of group #1 left in between 2010 and 2012. There are still tons of folks here who made accounts on day one, but a lot of the more conservative or libertarian leaning folks seem to have migrated to other communities around that time.
>other communities
lobste.rs ?
I think there's more keeping things in check here than at ./ when group #2 joined.
Re:A Pre-History of Slashdot
by boondaburrah on Friday October 06, 2017 @12:30AM
(#15414437)
I'm definitely in group 2. Possibly in group 3 if that's a thing.
I think I am 'Group 3'. My account is 4 1/2 years old and I was a 'read only' site visitor for a while before that.
So there were the people who got here first, then the people who discovered the site in 2008, which was a long time ago, and have fair claim to being 'group 2'.
So I think 'Group 3' is me. A defining characteristic of 'Group 3' is that goes back to pre-Snowden times, before the truth was known. Kids today must be 'Group 4'.
This reminds me of A Brief History of Who Ruined Burning Man:
https://journal.burningman.org/2016/10/philosophical-center/...