Re:How to Legally Own Another Person (2015) [pdf]
by pasquinelli on Thursday October 05, 2017 @01:56AM
(#15406919)
off topic: the word prose refers to ordinary written language, as opposed to, say, poetry, so when you describe his writing as near-prose like, i'm not sure what you're getting at, but i think you mean to say he writes fairly poetic prose.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How to Legally Own Another Person (2015) [pdf]
by twic on Thursday October 05, 2017 @03:10AM
(#15407162)
Any guess at what the grandparent thought 'courtesan' meant?
Re:How to Legally Own Another Person (2015) [pdf]
by denom on Thursday October 05, 2017 @10:38PM
(#15414067)
I meant Courtier [1] I see NN Taleb as someone who _attends_ to power, but can never wield real power himself.
Re:How to Legally Own Another Person (2015) [pdf]
by barry-cotter on Thursday October 05, 2017 @03:27AM
(#15407237)
Courtier, implying well spoken andamusing
Re:How to Legally Own Another Person (2015) [pdf]
by danieltillett on Thursday October 05, 2017 @06:46AM
(#15408104)
Prostitute. No this is not a complement in the context.
Re:How to Legally Own Another Person (2015) [pdf]
by n4r9 on Thursday October 05, 2017 @08:03AM
(#15408420)
My guess is that "near-prose like" refers to writing that feels like it is being spoken as you read it. I can somewhat understand that.
I've never read any of this guy's work before. Despite the "preliminary draft" footnote, he strikes me as not a very thoughtful writer. I can forgive "Sometimes around the fifth century" but not "beggars who flouted they scorn of material possessions". Flouted material possessions? Flaunted their scorn of material possessions? Once I get the impression that someone is using words without fully understanding their meaning, it's hard for me to seriously consider what they are trying to convey. Perhaps that's a little harsh, but he is supposed to be a writer.