News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Notes on Programming in C (1989) by dvfjsdhgfv on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @03:26PM (#15403665)
Function pointers are interesting in C only because they solve certain problems that you wouldn't have to care about if you used another language. They make the language more expressive, but with great power comes great danger. These days, unless we really have to (supporting legacy systems etc.) we shouldn't use C but rather one of these (still to few IMO) modern languages that give you even more power while being close in efficiency to C.
Re:Notes on Programming in C (1989) by apk-d on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @03:38PM (#15403799)
I occasionally see someone older than me refer to C as a high-level language and get really confused for a second. (I'm employed as a JS developer (although most of my expertise is centered around C#).)
Re:Notes on Programming in C (1989) by spc476 on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @04:12PM (#15404129)
Back in the 80s, C was a high level language on your typical home computer. I recall in the 90s it was common to argue about the trade offs between writing an application in C vs. Assembly. Today, it's Java (Rust or Go) vs C.

I'm just scared at what's coming down the pike that makes Javascript a "low level language."

Re:Notes on Programming in C (1989) by kurtisc on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @06:20PM (#15405229)
Espruino