Re:Judge blasts Waymo v. Uber lawyers, delays trial until De...
by drawnwren on Tuesday October 03, 2017 @08:20PM
(#15397371)
This case was started when Google discovered that Uber's Spider prototype was identical to an early Google lidar. It now appears that they haven't been using it primarily, but your hypothetical smoking gun is literally the foundation of this case.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Judge blasts Waymo v. Uber lawyers, delays trial until De...
by aetherson on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @08:03AM
(#15399854)
My impression -- and I could be wrong, I haven't seen a lot of discussion of the Spider since the early stages of the case -- is that it was less similar than it initially appeared.
Re:Judge blasts Waymo v. Uber lawyers, delays trial until De...
by Natsu on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @04:19AM
(#15399008)
Do you know of any place with actual transcripts of the entire hearing?
My reading of the article was that they'd dropped patents from the case entirely, but that quote might have been misleading.
Re:Judge blasts Waymo v. Uber lawyers, delays trial until De...
by drawnwren on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @04:09PM
(#15404111)
I don't. I do remember Judge Alsup raised concerns about Waymo being able to show damages from these patent infringements a while ago. I believe that this was part of the reason that Waymo revised their claims, and might point to why the spider prototype isn't as much of a smoking gun as we expect.