News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What a debate about p-values shows about science by sideshowb on Tuesday October 03, 2017 @09:24AM (#15392199)
Give them a break. It's a pop science article. Such articles can describe 1.5 concepts at most, so having used that budget on p-values, it's not available for Bayes, so explaining the concept from a frequentist perspective is reasonable.

Also Bayesian analysis (as a mainstream stats technique) is relatively new as it has only become mainstream with the advent of cheap computing power.

Re:What a debate about p-values shows about science by cwyers on Tuesday October 03, 2017 @04:13PM (#15395737)
Can I criticize the preprint from Lakens and his collaborators, which says the same thing as this "pop science" article?

https://psyarxiv.com/9s3y6

Re:What a debate about p-values shows about science by sideshowb on Tuesday October 03, 2017 @06:12PM (#15396661)
Oh alright go on then ;)