Re:The Media Has Neglected Puerto Rico
by emodendroket on Monday October 02, 2017 @09:21PM
(#15389347)
I'm guessing what's intended is actually to attack the US government's handling of Puerto Rico as being on an essentially colonial basis -- something that I find hard to completely dismiss if you look at bombing them in the 50s, the current debt crisis being worsened severely by Congress' refusal to allow recourse to bankruptcy, the shameful failure to render aid after Maria, etc.
Re:The Media Has Neglected Puerto Rico
by spaceseaman on Monday October 02, 2017 @09:48PM
(#15389472)
> bombing them in the 50s, the current debt crisis being worsened severely by Congress' refusal to allow recourse to bankruptcy, the shameful failure to render aid after Maria
Just wanna say that I completely agree, but also wanted to tack on their non-existent representation in Congress.
Re:The Media Has Neglected Puerto Rico
by maxerickson on Monday October 02, 2017 @09:41PM
(#15389437)
I think it is rather likely they were aware of the connotation.
And the comment you replied to is also likely aware of such. That's why they pointed out a global cooperative body making noises about Puerto Rico and decolonization.
Also, your mention of Haiti is confused; it was a French colony, not a colony of the UK or US.
Re:The Media Has Neglected Puerto Rico
by spaceseaman on Monday October 02, 2017 @09:49PM
(#15389481)
> your mention of Haiti is confused; it was a French colony, not a colony of the UK or US
Nice catch. And yeah, I just wanted to try and make things clear - no intention to be sassy.
If the poster was instead trying to use this bad connotation to assist the argument that Puerto Rico probably shouldn't be a territory (which I now assume after looking at your comment), then that argument was lost in what was written. The writing is unclear in its intent, and that is likely why some folks misunderstood it. It kinda assumes you get lucky and interpret what he's saying the right way.