News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Diminishing returns of static typing by crdoconnor on Monday October 02, 2017 @04:23PM (#15387585)
>there are a whole class of bugs that I don't need to test for any more because I can't even write the failing case.

By adding sanity checking asserts in a dynamically typed language you can achieve more or less the same result.

Re:Diminishing returns of static typing by wstrange on Monday October 02, 2017 @04:48PM (#15387809)
If you are going to add a bunch of asserts, why not just use types?
Re:Diminishing returns of static typing by crdoconnor on Monday October 02, 2017 @05:14PM (#15388029)
I don't particularly see the need to extend this approach to every single variable in my code base. I usually just stick it on boundary code.