Re:It’s time to give Firefox another chance
by ubernostrum on Saturday September 30, 2017 @10:32PM
(#15376078)
I'm not saying the labels wanted to go DRM-free. I'm saying that it was the only option they had at that point. They got legitimately scared of Apple's dominance in the market, and the only way to introduce a viable competitor was to do what they did with Amazon and a DRM-free store.
And just for the record, responses like "ROFL" and calling things "moronic" (as you did in your other comment) don't really make you look like you know what you're talking about or like you're someone who should be taken seriously.
Re:It’s time to give Firefox another chance
by syshum on Sunday October 01, 2017 @07:17AM
(#15377318)
It was not the only option that had, nor did they desire in any way to go DRM free, they had to be forced into it by both Amazon and Apple.
And just for the record, responses like your revisionist history, and Hyperbolic non-sense don't really make you look like you know what your talking about or like you're someone who should be taken seriously
Re:It’s time to give Firefox another chance
by ubernostrum on Sunday October 01, 2017 @07:27AM
(#15377345)
You keep trying to put words in my mouth. It keeps not working. Consider a different approach.
ROFL.... That is ... wow... Nothing about that is factually accurate, to state the Record Labels was the driving force behind DRM free Music...
Ummm No...
>>>The fact that you keep claiming EME is DRM tells me that you either don't actually know how EME works or what it does, or that you are willfully lying about it. Which is it, please?
The fact you believe EME has any other purpose except DRM tell me you do not actually know the purpose of EME, or what is does.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPfdOOiuOHI