Re:Best attempts so far to skin Schrödinger’s cat (2016)
by passwordreset on Monday October 02, 2017 @01:07PM
(#15385667)
"The Many Worlds Interpretation, for instance, has no Observer, and defines a measurement as any thermodynamicly non-reverseable process." I'm interested in this, as I previously thought that the actual word "measurement" was still a bit of a mish-mosh for most interpretations. Do you have a reference for this?
Re:Best attempts so far to skin Schrödinger’s cat (2016)
by thehardsphere on Friday October 06, 2017 @08:05AM
(#15416094)
I'm mainly operating on what I remember from when I studied this in grad school years ago. This FAQ about MWI seems pretty detailed, and includes references to other sources: http://www.anthropic-principle.com/preprints/manyworlds.html
Part of this stems from early use of the words "observer" and "measurement" when describing the Uncertainty Principle. Most interpretations of quantum mechanics provide specific definitions of these words which differ from their use in common language. The Many Worlds Interpretation, for instance, has no Observer, and defines a measurement as any thermodynamicly non-reverseable process.