News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Best attempts so far to skin Schrödinger’s cat (2016) by thehardsphere on Saturday September 30, 2017 @10:14AM (#15372917)
Contrary to popular misconception, the Observer Effect and the Uncertainty Principle are not actually the same thing. The Observer Effect is something that can happen in all sorts of experiments, classical or not, and is a result poor experimental design. The Uncertainty Principle is a quantum mechanical phenomenon that cannot be controlled for, because the uncertainty of a particle's position and momentum is an inherent property of the matter wave nature of quantum objects.

Part of this stems from early use of the words "observer" and "measurement" when describing the Uncertainty Principle. Most interpretations of quantum mechanics provide specific definitions of these words which differ from their use in common language. The Many Worlds Interpretation, for instance, has no Observer, and defines a measurement as any thermodynamicly non-reverseable process.

Re:Best attempts so far to skin Schrödinger’s cat (2016) by passwordreset on Monday October 02, 2017 @01:07PM (#15385667)
"The Many Worlds Interpretation, for instance, has no Observer, and defines a measurement as any thermodynamicly non-reverseable process." I'm interested in this, as I previously thought that the actual word "measurement" was still a bit of a mish-mosh for most interpretations. Do you have a reference for this?
Re:Best attempts so far to skin Schrödinger’s cat (2016) by thehardsphere on Friday October 06, 2017 @08:05AM (#15416094)
I'm mainly operating on what I remember from when I studied this in grad school years ago. This FAQ about MWI seems pretty detailed, and includes references to other sources: http://www.anthropic-principle.com/preprints/manyworlds.html