Which is not that different that "reality as information", which is quite probable.

Besides, the actual objective reality/universe could just be a set of hazy possibilities in constant flux.

And it's only what WE call "reality" (and consider it as "objective") that appears fixed -- because of how our perception/brain perceives it.

Or an ever-permuting mush of probabilities that only becomes "evaluated" when thought experiences it. There's no way to know, but I personally like that interpretation because it meshes well with the idea that our reality is a simulation. No need to waste computation when it's not necessary.