News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:It’s time to give Firefox another chance by Karunamon on Friday September 29, 2017 @10:11PM (#15370798)
This kind of personal attacking is totally uncalled for here. Either their statement is correct or it is not, either Chrome is doing tracking on the sly or it is not.

Either there is proof, or there is not. The burden of proof is on the one making the argument.

So which is it?

Re:It’s time to give Firefox another chance by skinnymuch on Saturday September 30, 2017 @11:40AM (#15373352)
But we are talking about green accounts here. Literally colored green usernames. Why is HN doing that if not to indicate they are new accounts?
Re:It’s time to give Firefox another chance by Karunamon on Saturday September 30, 2017 @07:58PM (#15375642)
What does the age of their account have to do with the correctness of their statements or the attempt by GP to shift the burden of proof?
Re:It’s time to give Firefox another chance by skinnymuch on Sunday October 01, 2017 @06:02PM (#15380111)
I'm just curious why HN highlights new users. Why do you think they do? HN already tries to take action against "aggressive" accounts or astroturfing with ghosting them, so it seems possible because of that, that they highlight new accounts for similar possible reasons.
Re:It’s time to give Firefox another chance by freehunter on Saturday September 30, 2017 @09:49AM (#15372844)
>This kind of personal attacking is totally uncalled for here.

If that was true, new accounts wouldn't be clearly marked as green in the comments.