News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Edward Snowden: Zcash Is 'Most Interesting Bitcoin Alternative'. Parent comment

Re:Edward Snowden: Zcash Is 'Most Interesting Bitcoin Altern... by ewillbefull on Friday September 29, 2017 @06:07PM (#15369666)
Zcash's zk-SNARKs are totally private even if that ceremony failed and even if the cryptographic assumptions underlying zk-SNARKs fall apart.

I find the comparison with Bitcoin perfect. The same people trusting PoW cartels to keep their system operational are complaining that zk-SNARKs require a parameter setup for proof soundness? That doesn't really make sense to me.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Edward Snowden: Zcash Is 'Most Interesting Bitcoin Altern... by SomeStupidPoint on Friday September 29, 2017 @06:32PM (#15369820)
> zk-SNARKs are totally private even if ... the cryptographic assumptions underlying zk-SNARKs fall apart

On the face of it, that sounds very wrong. Could you elaborate on what you were saying?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Edward Snowden: Zcash Is 'Most Interesting Bitcoin Altern... by ewillbefull on Friday September 29, 2017 @06:56PM (#15369963)
Zero-knowledge proofs for a given statement, by definition, reveal nothing about its witness. zk-SNARKs (used by Zcash) are statistically zero-knowledge; there are no cryptographic assumptions involved.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Edward Snowden: Zcash Is 'Most Interesting Bitcoin Altern... by EGreg on Saturday September 30, 2017 @11:54PM (#15376306)
As a slight aside, I always wondered if zero-knowledge proofs really reveal "slight" knowledge.

That is, if I ask 1 billion questions about a resource, and get true, verifiable answers, can't I find out something about it? For example, some projection onto a linear subspace or something.

[ Parent | on HN ]