Did this difference emerge very recently?
Because for someone who claims that, it seems bizarre that you entered this thread by stating: "Let me ask you how many of immigrants are grad students or people with high tech jobs?"
How is that more "evaluated" or "at least calculated" that what the parent wrote? Where were the numbers that go with this?
You then went on to give non-arguments combined with non-facts: "Is it one of the stupidest thing to say drop in IQ is connected to immigrants!"
And on with the non-arguments + non-facts: "It is greatly disappointing to see this kind of nonsense in HN which is kind of home for many hackers and programmers. Hearing these kind of stupid ideas in C-Span? Who cares? But HN, that shows how low our societies has become."
or not? And asking question or pointing calculation flow in one argument has nothing to do with evaluating your idea before puting forward.
Seriously, Why do you keep repeating yourself!
This is the difference between you and me. Before putting an argument forward I would evaluate it or at least calculate it a little bit!
>It seems that your concerns are more tied to a priori axioms and emotional resistance than actual methodological issues in the questions.
Why would you say that? The only thing i wanted was a little bit evidence and calculation! And it is funny in your nonsense world I am the emotional one here!