News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A “right to repair” movement tools up by Teever on Thursday September 28, 2017 @11:05PM (#15362459)
Sure but it seems a little inefficient to send them individually is my point.
Re:A “right to repair” movement tools up by icebraining on Friday September 29, 2017 @01:46AM (#15363011)
You never ship them individually, you use containers. And it's probably quite efficient: the shipping boats have to return to China anyway to get more stuff.
Re:A “right to repair” movement tools up by jdietrich on Friday September 29, 2017 @05:59AM (#15363987)
It's basically free.

There's far more stuff coming from China to the west than vice-versa. A ship can't travel empty, but needs to be ballasted with an appropriate weight of cargo. If there isn't enough booked cargo on the return leg to China, they'll make up the weight with scrap metal or rubble.

Re:A “right to repair” movement tools up by Teever on Friday September 29, 2017 @02:31PM (#15367814)
I'm referring to the shipping of the broken goods to amazon individually. That's the part I'm critical of.

Sure, send them back to China, I don't care, it just seems silly that we would all just mail our broken junk back one piece at a time to AMazon who then puts it in a container and sends it to China.

Better to take it to alocal recycling facility for them to send it en masse. Have Amazon give you a voucher to handle the recycling fee.

Re:A “right to repair” movement tools up by icebraining on Friday September 29, 2017 @03:24PM (#15368327)
Trucks coming from the Amazon warehouse also have to come back.

Still, Amazon just gifted me an item when I tried to return it since I ordered it by mistake (and I was honest on the form). I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to avoid recycling returns too.