Re:GM's Super Cruise: Driving a 2018 Cadillac CT6 with a Ful...
by freerobby on Thursday September 28, 2017 @08:38AM
(#15356627)
Why? Humans drive today without any of this, and with much less sensory perception than 360-degree cameras, radar, lidar, ultrasonics, GPS anchoring, and digital maps. What's the limitation on being able to synthesize these inputs and respond to them?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GM's Super Cruise: Driving a 2018 Cadillac CT6 with a Ful...
by kelvin0 on Thursday September 28, 2017 @09:18AM
(#15356859)
I don't think machines currently have enough contextual information to be able to drive fully automated. Case in point: the limitations mentioned in the article.
I don't think you can compare human cognition and driving abilities to current AI/Hardware, since the roads and all the information to drive are geared towards humans.
This being said: I do believe fully automated cars will come, but the 2 conditions I mentioned are prerequisites (in my opinion).
Re:GM's Super Cruise: Driving a 2018 Cadillac CT6 with a Ful...
by falcolas on Thursday September 28, 2017 @09:20AM
(#15356875)
Computation power and reliability.
Visual identification algorithms are not fast enough to keep up with driving, let alone distance, direction, and speed inference. Speeding them up is a largely parallel job, but cars don't have the space/power/temperature-controlled/vibration-free environment to support the necessary hardware.